← Dashboard

NVIDIA

equityAI momentum leadership
219.22+6.09%
Delayed · Actual · yahoo · as of 8/5/2026, 8:00:00 PM UTC
Need evidenceChart leans up1H chart83% model scoreHigh convictionBaseline view78% agreementagents right 47% here

NVIDIA remains a leadership proxy for AI, semiconductors, and high-beta growth risk.

Path: choppy — direction unreliable (R² 0.015).

Price Chart

AI momentum leadership
Loading…
Overlays🔒 Core

Yellow cone: the ±1σ expected range fanning forward from now, widening with √time over the next 5 sessions (from realized volatility). It answers “where” as a range, not a direction — about 1 in 3 moves ends OUTSIDE it, so it is a range to study, not a boundary or a target.

In the news

No recent tracked headlines for this market.

News & Events

quiet
No recent tracked headlines

Use the event-risk banner above for scheduled releases.

The Read

NVIDIA: AI momentum leadership. Likely range over the next 5 sessions is about 207.31–231.13. Bullish lean, high conviction. This is context, not a prediction.

The Read

NVIDIA
Current lean
Bullish lean · High conviction
Expected range
207.31231.135 sessions · ±5.434%
Market state
AI momentum leadership
Track record
Reads here have been right 47% of 17 calls (5-day horizon).
Read changes if
Sustained close below first support.

Measured context, not a price prediction or order. You always decide.

← All markets
NVDA

NVIDIA

equity
219.22 6.09% today
Need evidenceChart leans up
83%model scoreHigh conviction1H descriptive chart read

What the agents think

Need evidence: Required market, cost, or validation evidence is missing. Strategy: No qualified strategy. Net-positive-return probability: Not established.

NVIDIA remains a leadership proxy for AI, semiconductors, and high-beta growth risk.

Reasons it could go up: Confirmation improves if NVIDIA holds above near-term support while dependency conflicts fade.

Reasons it could go down: The setup weakens if macro drivers reverse or price closes through the invalidation level.

Chart read changes if: Sustained close below first support.

What would this cost me?

What would this cost me?

This read has no invalidation price yet, so there is no stop to size against. Without a price that proves the idea wrong, the risk is undefined — and an undefined risk is not one to take.

Before you act — the A+ check

A+ setup check

This read has no invalidation price yet, so there is no stop to gate against. Without a level that would prove the idea wrong, the discipline check can’t run — and an undefined risk is not one to take.

What might happen next

Continuation

What to monitor
Price respects the current regime and dependency confirmation remains intact.

Invalidation

What to monitor
Sustained close below first support.

Markets that move with this one

Want the numbers behind this? Switch to Pro in the top bar for charts, agent scores, and levels — or ask the agents to run a fresh analysis.

Ask the agents

NVIDIA

← All marketsSwitch to Pro in the top bar for full charts, levels & agent scores
Need evidence: NVIDIAChart leans up on the 1H chart
219.22 6.09% today

NVIDIA remains a leadership proxy for AI, semiconductors, and high-beta growth risk.

No qualified strategy

Required market, cost, or validation evidence is missing.

Directional model score83%
ConvictionHigh conviction
Agents agreeing78%
Positive net returnNot established
Right here lately47% of 17 calls
Descriptive chart read changes ifSustained close below first support.

Price chart1H · AI momentum leadership

Loading…
Overlays🔒 Core

Why the agents think this

Reasons it could go up

Confirmation improves if NVIDIA holds above near-term support while dependency conflicts fade.

Reasons it could go down

The setup weakens if macro drivers reverse or price closes through the invalidation level.

This idea is wrong if

Sustained close below first support.

What changed recently

Dependency matrix now contributes an explicit confidence adjustment instead of treating the market in isolation.

What might happen next

Continuation

Price respects the current regime and dependency confirmation remains intact.

Invalidation

Sustained close below first support.

Want every agent’s score, key support/resistance levels, and the cross-market signals behind this read? Switch to Pro in the top bar for the full desk.

AI analysis to study, not orders to follow. You always decide — and never risk money you can’t afford to lose.

What would this cost me?

This read has no invalidation price yet, so there is no stop to size against. Without a price that proves the idea wrong, the risk is undefined — and an undefined risk is not one to take.

A+ setup check

This read has no invalidation price yet, so there is no stop to gate against. Without a level that would prove the idea wrong, the discipline check can’t run — and an undefined risk is not one to take.

Evidence Decision

Need evidence

Required market, cost, or validation evidence is missing.

Directional model score83%
Agent agreement78%
Cross-market confirmation50%
Cross-market conflict8%
Strategy and stage

No qualified strategy · unvalidated

Positive net return

Not established

Net expectancy

Not established

Open evidence gates

measured strategy evidence, fresh non synthetic inputs

Bull case

Confirmation improves if NVIDIA holds above near-term support while dependency conflicts fade.

Bear case

The setup weakens if macro drivers reverse or price closes through the invalidation level.

Chart read changes if

Sustained close below first support.

What changed

Dependency matrix now contributes an explicit confidence adjustment instead of treating the market in isolation.

Your Risk

What would this cost me?

This read has no invalidation price yet, so there is no stop to size against. Without a price that proves the idea wrong, the risk is undefined — and an undefined risk is not one to take.

Before You Act

A+ setup check

This read has no invalidation price yet, so there is no stop to gate against. Without a level that would prove the idea wrong, the discipline check can’t run — and an undefined risk is not one to take.

Institutional analytics

Research analytics, non-executing by design

Market detail views surface data traceability and scenario context for the selected symbol.

Portfolio risk

Exposure, leverage, concentration, and drawdown analytics are built on versioned market data. Values appear only when they trace to a trusted dataset — nothing is estimated for display.

Factors and scenarios

Factor exposures and stress scenarios are computed only where a measured data source exists, and every shock definition is stated explicitly.

Execution quality

Spread, slippage, and other cost analytics stay educational until measured cost evidence passes deterministic checks.

Every displayed value must trace to a versioned market-data source. Sizing and setup content stays educational and non-executing; this platform never places trades.

Scenario Prompts

ContinuationPrice respects the current regime and dependency confirmation remains intact.
InvalidationSustained close below first support.

Model Score Trend

Waiting for history

Directional model score across recent runs. This is not a probability of profit.

Technicals

as of 2026-08-05
52-week range position76.1% · -7.32% off the high0% = at the low 164.07, 100% = at the high 236.54
Today vs its own history+3.435% · 85th percentile1.28× its typical daily move (outlier-robust z)
Volatility rank48th percentile20d realized vs 5y of dailies · currently 2.43%/day
Path quality (20 bars)choppy — direction unreliable0.015 · slope -0.0716%/bar — high R² means the arrow is trustworthy
Closing streak5 days upconsecutive daily closes in one direction
Expected move (1σ)±2.43% / day · ±5.434% / 5dabout 2 in 3 similar periods stay inside; realized close-to-close vol (30d), sqrt-of-time scaling

Pivot levels from 2026-08-04

R3217.66H4214.15
R2215.36H3213.04
R1213.65P 211.35
S1209.64
S2207.34L3210.84
S3205.63L4209.73
Classic (left) and Camarilla (right) — arithmetic on the prior session, not predictions.

Distance from averages

SMA20+6.751% (+1.76 ATR)
SMA50+6.539% (+1.7 ATR)
SMA200+13.238% (+3.24 ATR)

Typical session ranges

Asia (22–07 UTC)
London (07–13 UTC)
New York (13–21 UTC)3.606% · n=23
London–NY overlap (13–16 UTC)3.144% · n=23
hourly bars, ~1 month

Monthly tendency

About 5 yearly samples per month — a tendency at best, never a signal.

Source: NVDA via Yahoo chart API (daily, 5y). Descriptive measurements, not signals or advice.

Agent Breakdown

4 agents
AgentBiasModel scoreAssessmentKey Levels
Technical agentbullish76%NVIDIA technical structure is bullish inside a AI momentum leadership regime.Invalidation: 1H close below 217.9ATR 13.35event or volatility riskS 217.9 / 217.25R 220.54 / 221.42
News / sentiment agentbullish68%NVIDIA is scored through equity beta, volatility regime, real yields, sector leadership, and stock-specific momentum.conf adj -0.070
Regime / correlation agentbullish74%Measured moderate positive correlation with QQQ (0.6521); regime classified as AI momentum leadership.regime AI momentum leadershipstability 0.803corr regime calmrolling ρ 0.652driver QQQ
Risk agentneutral62%Position sizing should be reduced until event and volatility risk normalizes.disagreement 0.240reduced sizemonitor event window